• Modelers Alliance has updated the forum software on our website. We have migrated all post, content and user accounts but we could not migrate the passwords.
    This requires that you manually reset your password.
    Please click here, http://modelersalliance.org/forums/login to go to logon page and use the "Forgot your Password" option.

I.J.N. FUSO 1944

MrT said:
centaur567 said:
I have a book about the Imperial Japanese Navy from their vantage. They really kicked our butts the first couple of years. Will stay tuned for this build. Gary
Click to expand...

There is no doubt that they were better prepared for war in 1941 then the U.S. Navy.

B)
Click to expand...

Yep, they figured they had a 6 month window to sour the US's taste for war. Once we got rolling it was over, Yamato knew it going in. They didn't want Pearl, there's no way to hold it, just wanted to kill the fleet and morale.

I love reading about Midway and how the few carriers held the entire war effort in the balance. By '45, we had over a hundred carriers in the Pacific and the Japanese still haven't recovered from '42 losses.
 
Ok let's get started.

DSC05589.JPG


DSC05591.JPG


DSC05592.JPG


DSC05593.JPG


DSC05594.JPG


DSC05595.JPG


DSC05596.JPG


:)
 
Interesting looking ship . It looks to have modern ( WW II ) feature and yet it has some that remind me of the earlier battle wagons .

Cheers, Christian B)
 
phantom II said:
Interesting looking ship . It looks to have modern ( WW II ) feature and yet it has some that remind me of the earlier battle wagons .

Cheers, Christian B)
Click to expand...

That would be true being built during the WW I time frame.

B)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top